David Lilenfeld Blog The intellectual property blog of David Lilenfeld

5Feb/111988

Is Your Name Also a Trademark?

By David Lilenfeld on February 5, 2011

This blog entry was inspired by Sarah Palin and her daughter, Bristol.  No, I am not about to get political, so keep reading.  Instead, the famous Alaskans have given me an opportunity to write about trademark law's treatment of  personal names.

Sarah and Bristol Palin have applied to the United States Patent and Trademark Office to register their names as trademarks.  Ms. Palin claims she uses SARAH PALIN in connection with providing “[i]nformation about political elections” and “motivational speaking services in the field of politics, culture, business and values.”  Bristol says she uses BRISTOL PALIN in connection with “motivational speaking services in the field of life choices.”  Here are their applications: Sarah/Bristol.

Will the Palins have a hard time obtaining these registrations -- “you betcha”!

A person cannot register her name as a trademark without a showing of “secondary meaning.”  Secondary meaning is a high standard to meet.  In connection with personal names, it is achieved when the public has come to recognize the personal name as a symbol that identifies the service (or good), in contrast to identifying the person.

The mark SARAH PALIN is used to identify a person, not a service.  In other words, the public does not connect the name SARAH PALIN with a particular service, but rather with a particular person, at least not yet.  The same reasoning applies to Bristol, perhaps even more so since she does not have same level of notoriety as her mother.

Secondary meaning tends to grow out of a long association of the name with a particular business.  Secondary meaning requires that, in the public mind, the primary meaning of the name as a word identifying a person has been lost in favor of identifying the business.  Examples of personal names which have acquired secondary meaning – and therefore are protected as trademarks -- are RONALD MCDONALD, HOWARD JOHNSON and, to a lesser extent, MARTHA STEWART. Indeed, it takes time before the name and the business become synonymous in the public mind.

So, if you hear a loud “doggone it” coming from Wasilla, that means the Palins just received a final refusal to register their names as trademarks.  It's on the way.

Filed under: Q&A Leave a comment
Comments (1988) Trackbacks (0)
  1. Awesome facts. Kudos! promethazin

  2. You suggested this really well. inderal xl

  3. Incredible many of excellent advice. hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg

  4. Thanks a lot, Ample postings.
    inderal xl

  5. Truly a good deal of terrific advice. augmentin 875 mg

  6. Very good write ups, With thanks. advair diskus

  7. Really quite a lot of fantastic knowledge! hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg

  8. Really a good deal of helpful information! amoxil

  9. next nation [url=http://viacheapusa.com/#]viagra sale no prescription[/url] slightly primary carefully
    box generic for viagra forth independence
    viagra sale no prescription anyway entertainment http://viacheapusa.com/

  10. Thanks, Lots of posts.
    retin

  11. Beneficial information. Appreciate it. domperidone 10 mg

  12. Very good stuff, Thanks a lot! proscar

  13. Many thanks! Loads of advice.
    finasterida

  14. Cheers! Numerous knowledge!
    inderal

  15. Whoa lots of good knowledge. lisinopril

  16. Regards! Numerous advice!
    inderal medication

  17. Thanks a lot, I value this. retin-a

  18. Thank you. Quite a lot of tips!
    low cost viagra

  19. You actually expressed this terrifically! prescription discount

  20. Beneficial postings. Appreciate it! drugs online

  21. You definitely made the point. cbd


Leave a comment


*

No trackbacks yet.


Go to top ↑
-->